Overslaan en naar de inhoud gaan

page search

Displaying 1105 - 1116 of 1308

REDD-Net Asia-Pacific Bulletin #4: Gender and REDD+

LandLibrary Resource
Institutional & promotional materials
april, 2011
India
Nepal
South-Eastern Asia

International discussions on REDD+ and climate change have explicitly addressed the needs of indigenous peoples. However, to date, efforts to link REDD+ and climate change activities to the specific protection of rights of women have been very limited. This brief explores how REDD+ planning and implementation can and should enhance the conditions of rural women in Asia and the Pacific.

Forests and Climate Change After Cancun: An Asia-Pacific Perspective

LandLibrary Resource
Reports & Research
februari, 2011
Global
South-Eastern Asia

The United Nations climate change talks in Cancun changed the shape of REDD+ negotiations and global forest policies. What effect will the decisions from the talks have on forests and forest users in Asia and the Pacific? Eleven climate change and forestry experts gathered to reflect on these issues, and this booklet summarizes their responses to 12 key questions.

National Action Program on Climate Change 2011.

LandLibrary Resource
National Policies
januari, 2011
Mongolia

To ensure environmental sustainability, development of socioeconomic sectors adapted to climate change, reduction of vulnerabilities and risks, and mitigation of GHG emissions as well as promoting economic effectiveness and efficiency and implementation of ‘green growth’ policies, the Parliament of Mongolia developed the National Action Program on Climate Change (NAPCC) to be implemented, in tw

Free, Prior, and Informed Consent in REDD+: Principles and Approaches for Policy and Project Development

LandLibrary Resource
Training Resources & Tools
januari, 2011
South-Eastern Asia

The principle that indigenous peoples and local communities have a right to give or withhold their Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) to developments affecting their resources is not new. However, experience using FPIC in REDD+ implementation is still limited in the Asia-Pacific region.

Đồng thuận dựa trên nguyên tắc Tự nguyện, Trước và được Thông tin đầy đủ trong REDD+

LandLibrary Resource
Training Resources & Tools
januari, 2011
Vietnam

Cuốn sách hướng dẫn này cung cấp nền tảng cơ sở cho việc phát triển hướng dẫn quốc gia cụ thể về Đồng thuận dựa trên nguyên tắc Tự nguyện, Trước và được Thông tin đầy đủ trong REDD+.

Regulation to the Community Rights Law with Respect to Forest Lands (as amended).

LandLibrary Resource
Regulations
december, 2010
Liberia

This Regulation of the Forestry Development Authority (FDA) implements provisions of the Community Rights Law of 2009 with Respect to Forest Lands ("Community Rights Law"), and determines the rules, guidelines and procedures for the establishment of authorized forest communities and to access, manage, use and the benefits of forest resources within the Republic of Liberia, and participation by

Programme National d’Investissements pour l’Environnement et les Ressources Naturelles au Togo (PNIERN), 2011-2015

LandLibrary Resource
National Policies
december, 2010
Togo

L’objectif global du Programme National d’Investissements pour l’Environnement et les Ressources Naturelles au Togo (PNIERN) est de gérer durablement l’environnement et les ressources naturelles en vue de contribuer à l’amélioration de la sécurité alimentaire et à la croissance économique du pays et à la réduction de la pauvreté.

NO FIM NÃO VAI FICAR NADA

LandLibrary Resource
Reports & Research
december, 2010
África
África subsariana
Moçambique
O objecto deste relatório são os utilizadores dos produtos florestais e os efeitos da conjugação
das suas estratégias e actividades extractivas na sustentabilidade dos recursos naturais e no
desenvolvimento sustentável da região.

REDD-Net Asia-Pacific Bulletin #3: Carbon Rights and REDD+

LandLibrary Resource
Institutional & promotional materials
december, 2010
South-Eastern Asia

REDD+ is based on the right to benefit from (or to be compensated for) reducing forest-based emissionsn of greenhouse gases, either through fund-based payments, carbon market payments, or a combination of these. But who can claim this right? Should an entitlement to payment depend on who owns the so-called "carbon rights"?