Overslaan en naar de inhoud gaan

page search

Community Organizations Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Acronym
FAO
United Nations Agency

Focal point

Javier Molina Cruz
Phone number
+390657051

Location

Headquarters
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
00153
Rome
Italy
Working languages
Arabic
Chinese
English
Spanish
French

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations leads international efforts to defeat hunger. Serving both developed and developing countries, FAO acts as a neutral forum where all nations meet as equals to negotiate agreements and debate policy. FAO is also a source of knowledge and information. We help developing countries and countries in transition modernize and improve agriculture, forestry and fisheries practices and ensure good nutrition for all. Since our founding in 1945, we have focused special attention on developing rural areas, home to 70 percent of the world's poor and hungry people.

Members:

Naomi Kenney
Ilario Rea
Ana Paula De Lao
Marianna Bicchieri
Valerio Tranchida
Dubravka Bojic
Margret Vidar
Brad Paterson
Carolina Cenerini
VG Tenure
Stefanie Neno
Julien Custot
Francesca Gianfelici
Giulio DiStefano
Renata Mirulla
Gerard Ciparisse
Jeff Tschirley
Marieaude Even
Richard Eberlin
Yannick Fiedler
Rumyana Tonchovska
Ann-Kristin Rothe
Sally Bunning
Imma Subirats

Resources

Displaying 3126 - 3130 of 5074

Réforme agraire: colonisation et coopératives agricoles 2007/2

Journal Articles & Books
november, 2007
Egypt
Switzerland
Lithuania
Croatia
Germany
Denmark
Australia
Canada
Finland
Thailand
New Zealand
Kenya
Tajikistan
Albania
Italy
Botswana
Cambodia
Georgia
Romania
Ghana
Europe
Asia

The articles in this issue supplement the recent publication "Good governance in land tenure and administration" (Land Tenure Studies No. 9), which provides practical advice for land professionals on improving governance in a land administration system or other land tenure arrangement.

Les mangroves d’Océanie 1980-2005: Rapports nationaux

Reports & Research
november, 2007
France
Switzerland
Fiji
Samoa
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
Australia
Tonga
Guinea
New Zealand
Palau
Japan
Kiribati
Malaysia
Italy
Papua New Guinea
Nauru
Oceania

The world’s mangroves 1980–2005 is a thematic study undertaken within the framework of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. It was led by FAO in collaboration with mangrove specialists throughout the world, and was co-funded by the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). It builds on the 1980 assessment, on the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (FRA 2000) and 2005 (FRA 2005), and on an extensive literature search and correspondence with mangrove and forest resources assessment specialists.

Negotiation and mediation techniques for natural resource management

Journal Articles & Books
november, 2007
Angola
Nepal
United States of America
Zambia
South Africa
Gambia
Mali
Sweden
Zimbabwe
Italy
Botswana
Germany
Namibia

This publication is part of a series of training materials on natural resources conflict management developed by FAOs Livelihood Support Programme. It supports the discussions presented in Negotiation and mediation techniques for natural resource management (2005) a conceptual guide by sharing recent, real-life experiences of Africans who have used the processes and principles of consensual negotiation and mediation to address natural resource conflicts.

Framework perspective on local participation in policy: Views through FAO experience

Journal Articles & Books
november, 2007
Mozambique
Honduras
Netherlands
Philippines
South Africa
El Salvador
Germany
Italy
Syrian Arab Republic
Bolivia
Cambodia
Canada
Brazil
Kenya

The goal of this exercise is to identify some of the tools a development agent needs for achieving effective local participation in policy development. The intended audiences are FAO professionals and their colleagues, in other agencies and in the field programs. This paper uses an analogy of walking and climbing to separate the familiar project experiences (the walking) from the less-known territory of policy influence (the climbing).