Topics and Regions
Land Portal Foundation administrative account
Details
Location
Contributions
Displaying 4411 - 4420 of 6947CNVP
CNVP (Connecting Natural Values and People) is a Dutch based organization operating in the Balkans. Being part of the forestry team within SNV http://www.snv.org a group of committed forestry engineers decided to establish CNVP in July, 2012. From its origins up to today this small team of enthusiastics has grown to 25 people from diversified backgrounds. Currently CNVP is implementing projects in Albania, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Conseil Interuniversitaire de la Communauté Française de Belgique
The Interuniversity Council of the French Community of Belgium (Conseil Interuniversitaire de la Communauté Française de Belgique or Commission Interuniversitaire des Universités Francophones) was until 2013 an advisory body in matters of scientific policy and higher education bringing together the delegates from the 8 universities of the French Community of Belgium, namely:
- the Notre-Dame de la Paix University Faculties (FUNDP) which have become the University of Namur;
Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture
The Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA) works to strengthen institutional capacities toward inclusive and sustainable agricultural and rural development (ISARD) in Southeast Asia through graduate education, research and development, and knowledge management.
SEARCA is a non-profit organization established by the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) in 1966.
Non-Timber Forest Products - Exchange Programme
The NTFP-EP is a collaborative network of over 60 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and community-based organizations (CBOs) working with forest-based communities to strengthen their capacity in the sustainable management of natural resources in the Philippines, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Cambodia.
Land Library Importers
If you have a big database with many publications, laws and regulations or multi media items and you would like those to be included in the Land Portal's Land Library, we might consider building an importer that takes care of the ingestion process of the database automatically.
Can an importer between my website and the Land Library be built?
databases. The Land Portal Foundation builds importers to aggregate metadata from websites that have such large databases that they cannot be added manually.
Are you curious whether your website could be suitable for such an importer? We need certain information from you in order to determine this:
- What kind of metadata model do you have on your website?
In order to determine whether we can build an importer, we need to determine whether our metadata models are sufficiently aligned that they can be linked without manual intervention. Click here to read more about the Land Portal metadata model.
- What kind of Content Management System is implemented on your website?
If your website uses a standard Content Management System (CMS), such as Wordpress, Drupal or CKAN, maybe it is possible to direct add them using its API capabilities. Please make sure to mention this when you contact us by email.
- Do you have your metadata available in another format?
If you have the metadata available in an spreadsheet (Excel, CSV...) or your system supports protocols like OAI-PMH, or provides a RESTful API or SPARQL endpoint that publishes the metadata records, please be sure to mention this as well when you contact us. Our IT staff will contact your system administrator in order to find the best way to include your resources in the Land Library.
Currently, we have develop some importers from format such as:
- Simple CSV file (You can download Land Library Metadata Example (Land Portal), as an example of spreadsheet with metadata).
- RDF/XML (You can download Land Library Resource example in RDF (Land Portal), as an example of RDF file).
- Endnote XML (from Mendeley) (see an example of input file in http://www.mekonglandforum.org/search/export/xml.
Contact us!
If you would like to explore further whether an importer between your database and the Land Library is possible, please contact us through our resource provider form.
Monedas en el Land Portal
Estas son las monedas que encontrará en el Land Portal.
Moedas no Land Portal
Essas são as moedas que você encontrará no Land Portal.
Devises sur le Land Portal
Ce sont les devises que vous allez trouver sur le Land Portal.
Building Sustainable Partnerships for the Implementation of Responsible Investments in Agricultural Land
General
The SPIRAL-Project aimed to test and further develop the concept of the Cocoa Production Cluster (CPC) as a responsible approach to investment in agricultural land in Sierra Leone. The CPC model aimed to retain land under customary ownership throughout, without reducing community land access for food production and provide secure tenure rights for the cocoa farmers recruited, while ensuring improved cocoa production, sustainable land management and a sustainable income stream. WHH also planned that the CPC model would inform national policy development on responsible agricultural investment, with a view to wider adoption of the model. The project also sought to establish a foundation for a longer-term effort to develop a community-owned cocoa enterprise. The aim was to go beyond existing ‘block farming’ models for improved cocoa production, in which cocoa traders provide inputs and cocoa offtake services to enable groups of smallholder producers to sell into export markets, in return for a share of the crop. The aspirational CPC model envisaged an agribusiness fully compliant with VGGT principles, to be incubated with the support of a business partner acting as farm manager holding clusters of cocoa production sites released by neighbouring land holding families. The farm manager would be responsible for improved production by locally recruited workers, farmer training, and business management for an initial period of 15 years, following 4 years for crop establishment under a revenue sharing arrangement with the landowners and workers. The plan was then to divide the land into small scale commercial farming divisions for allocation to selected workers and master farmers to manage operations for a further 15 years, during which the farm manager would gradually withdraw whole remaining as trustee, and to transfer the business as a whole into community ownership at the end. The project had four target investment areas comprising 13 villages located in three Chiefdoms of Dea, Luawa, and Kpeje Bongre (all in Kailahun District). The original business partner was BALMED, a local Sierra Leonean cocoa trader also engaged in the block farming approach. For an explanation of the CPC model and the project’s overall goals see WHH’s Spiral project brief. WHH also produced a summary comparison of main features of Cocoa Block farming as practiced in Sierra Leone with those of the proposed CPC model. During the project, WHH also commissioned an investigation into existing and potential alternative business models for agri business development in Sierra Leone by researcher Raoul Hermann: report available here. Without sufficient incentives or guarantees of returns for long term engagement, BALMED unfortunately decided to withdraw from the project after almost two years, citing difficulties of access to the investment target areas, higher than anticipated labour supervision costs, and inability to meet community requests including assistance in construction of access roads. Without a business partner the CPC model was not viable, so WHH assumed temporary and partial responsibility as stand-in s agri-business operator to take forward implementation of the project. As this created a potential conflict of interest for WHH as an NGO working on behalf of the community, WHH opted to create an independent social agri-business and made contacts with potential financiers, cocoa off-takers, and manufacturers to pitch the CPC model and raise investment funds. In view of this abrupt change, and following a field assessment mission to review options, LEGEND decided to fund a project exit strategy that included completion of the ongoing work judged to be useful in the national context, but falling short of original project ambitions and discontinuing activities which required active contribution of a business partner. This included: A participatory land tenure assessment and participatory land use planning exercise in 4 villages, to test and demonstrate methodologies to understand complex customary tenure rules and practices involving both women and men from amongst land owning families, family members and other community land users and stakeholders. Full report and guide to the methods adopted available here. Development and agreement of a detailed land lease agreement template, undertaken by legal support NGO Namati, for land released to the company by the participating communities and land holding families and the returns expected from the company. Because of the exit of the original business partner and the risks involved in this continuing long -term agribusiness development venture, LEGEND decided not to support WHH’s new strategy to develop the project by setting up its own company. With its own funds and initiative, WHH has since registered a spin-off company called ‘Lizard Earth’ to act as a new business partner to provide farm management services. It has also retained Namati’s services to negotiate and adapt the land lease template to requirements of the local community land owners in each participating village. Lizard Earth will then lease the land and act as trustee, temporary land owner and farm manager during the first phase. For details of the new social agribusiness company objectives and aspirations: see the Lizard Earth company presentation. Grantee’s products and project documentation The SPIRAL Project Brief Alternative Agricultural Business models for Large-scale Private Investments in Sierra Leone Land tenure & Participatory Land Use Planning Assessment Report & Guide The Block Farm and the CPC Model : Comparison of Two Responsible Investment Approaches