Aller au contenu principal

page search

Bibliothèque Power and Potential: A Comparative Analysis of National Laws and Regulations Concerning Women's Rights to Community Forests

Power and Potential: A Comparative Analysis of National Laws and Regulations Concerning Women's Rights to Community Forests

Power and Potential: A Comparative Analysis of National Laws and Regulations Concerning Women's Rights to Community Forests

Resource information

Date of publication
Novembre 2017
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
MLRF:2419
Pages
i-ii, 1-96

Up to 2.5 billion people hold and use the world’s community lands, yet the tenure rights of women—who comprise more than half the population of the world’s Indigenous Peoples and local communities—are seldom acknowledged or protected by national laws. Although gender norms and women’s forest tenure security vary widely across community-based tenure systems, this analysis concludes that national laws and regulations (referred to generally as “statutory laws”) on the rights of indigenous and rural women to inheritance, community membership, community-level governance, and community-level dispute resolution are consistently unjust, falling far below the requirements of international law and related standards. The 30 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) analyzed in this study are ill-positioned to meet their obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW); non-binding international guidance such as the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGT); and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), all of which necessitate the statutory recognition of women’s rights to community forests. Inadequate legal protections for the tenure rights of indigenous and rural women fail to re ect existing gender-equitable practices in indigenous and local communities, and enable community practices that discriminate against women, thereby weakening women’s tenure rights, jeopardizing the livelihoods of women and their families, and threatening the advancement of entire communities.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO