Revolutionizing Land Administration: Cadaster-First vs Fit-for-Purpose and Property Tax-First

The session examined two distinct methodologies in land administration—Fit-for-Purpose and Property Tax-first approaches—as potential solutions to the challenges of building effective national land cadasters in rapidly urbanizing areas. A diverse panel of experts and practitioners shared insights from real-world applications of each approach, highlighting successes and challenges. The Fit-for-Purpose model was presented as a flexible and cost-effective method, emphasizing efficiency and adaptability in the face of limited resources and evolving urban landscapes. In contrast, the Property Tax-first approach prioritized revenue generation through accurate property valuation and taxation, aiming to strengthen local government capacities to manage urban growth. The discussion underscored the strengths and weaknesses of each strategy, with a particular focus on how they address the complexities of land tenure security, urban planning, and the need for comprehensive cadastral data. Potential synergies between the two models were also explored, suggesting that a hybrid approach could offer a balanced solution to land administration in diverse contexts. The session concluded with an engaging Q&A, encouraging participants to delve deeper into the comparative advantages of the methodologies and consider how they might be applied in varying urban scenarios. Overall, the session emphasized the critical role of land administration systems in supporting sustainable urban development, highlighting the importance of tailored, context-specific solutions.


This resource has been made available by the organizers of the World Bank Land Conference under the following disclaimer.